Mormonism Hijacked

This is the South Park episode which includes a pretty good explanation of what happened when Joseph gave the manuscript to his scribe Martin Harris.

Top executives of the media (members of the Network) intentionally misrepresents the term “mind control”. They want people to think it’s silly or magical, something to be dismissed, or just hypnotism. In the reality, everyone is exposed to mind control on a daily basis, news, movies, commercials, schools. Usually it’s simply called marketing, but anything we observe has the potential to influence us. Sometimes, real information can trick us if presented out of context or an improper proportion.

Many psychological tactics to manage human behavior are utilized by the Mormon church. To assist in covering the blatant lies, the Mormon church discourages independent thought. Anything that has negative views of the Mormon church or its leaders is labeled “anti-Mormon” and is of the devil. Church leaders are directed by God and Jesus, and so they don’t even need to be questioned. But in addition to that trick, they instill fear by telling the members that Satan is the master trickster and normal humans don’t stand a chance against him and to rely completely on church sources of information.

The church also teaches its members to rely on the Holy Spirit, the third member of the godhead. This spirit supposedly confirms church teachings by giving its members good feelings. They call this, “Feeling the spirit”. There’s a second layer to this mind control technique, something to cause a good feeling such as a sentimental video, beautiful music, or someone bearing their soul in front of the congregation. The second part inspires a good feeling in the member, called “Inviting the Spirit”, and then this is confirmation that the church is true and the leaders are led by a God. Trick by association!

As a child, I would visit the Mormon visitor’s center with my family several times a year, see the illustration at the beginning of the article. I now understand these fond memories for what they are. The Mormon church, as other influential organizations, use the powerful vehicle of money to establish credibility. In the sentient creature’s mind, physical manifestations purchased with money and sweat, imply credibility. In my case, when young Hyrum entered the beautiful Mormon Visitor’s Center in downtown Salt Lake City, and when he saw all the beautiful paintings and pretty sister missionaries and professional men in suites, and when he saw the huge statue of Jesus, how could he possibly think it was all based on lies and half-truths? The existence of physical objects implies the veracity of what they symbolize.

1. To question or doubt anything also equates to a lack of faith. Not having faith is a dangerous situation!
2. Repetition
   • Weapons of mass destruction!
3. Music and other media
   • This is a powerful vehicle for concept enforcement. The Network knows how to use music to elicit emotional and instinctual responses to embed lies into the subconscious. This tactic is similar to “Feeling the Spirit” as mentioned above.
4. Peer pressure to lie
   • Members are often encouraged to bear their testimony, i.e., verbal expression they believe what the church claims. Little children are usually given a script by their parents or a leader something like the following, “I believe that this is the true church and that Jesus is the Christ and Joseph Smith was a prophet. and that we are led by a prophet today. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.”
   • The practice is justified by the ultimate goal of gaining a personal testimony, and the best way to gain a testimony is to express it. So basically, they repeat the lie often enough to start believing it, and as a side effect, other people are pressured to believe it too. When an individual hears everyone around them bearing their testimony, it creates the illusion that everyone around them believes. They feel discouraged by their own doubts. They forget that everyone is feeling the same way they do, all due to “innocent” lying.
5. Follow the crowd.
   • most people are followers so we just follow prominent people, so they just need to occupy those positions and everyone else follows.
6. Making indirect claims
   • Enforcing a lie without saying explicitly they are making an unsubstantiated claim. The following lyrics, “When will all this anger, hate and bigotry be gone?” imply that the world is full more of negativity than positivity without providing any evidence.

Although evidence is pretty clear that Mormonism began contrary to the church’s claims, it may indeed have had grass roots beginnings, i.e., not originating from large and established organizations. The answer doesn’t matter much, but sometime in the development of the church it caught the attention of the Network. They saw its potential for influence of public opinion, the true prize, but they also saw its potential to steal wealth and time from the lower classes, the 99.99%.

Maybe the Network decided to plant a bunch of seed religions in the early 18th and 19th centuries in the United States and then wait for which ones bloomed the best. Here’s some observations in support of these hypotheses.

• In many instance, the history of the church intersects with the banking industry. Joseph Smith and the early leaders started their own banks, swindling money and resources from the membership and then blaming Satan’s influence when the swindled wanted retribution.
• Mormon commercial interests have assets in the billions of dollars and they own hundreds of multi-million dollar businesses.
  • If you ask any member, they’ll proudly tell you how charitable their church is, but they’re a little confused. On average, church members are charitable, yes, but the church is not. I don’t have the time or resources to sufficiently investigate this although I’ve found some online sources of information. My last job (calling) in the church was as the ward assistant financial clerk. Every Sunday we’d take the tithing and other donations to the bank. Each ward gets so much money!!! From my experience, the church gives only a tiny portion of it’s revenue to charitable activities.
• The man who took lead of the organization, Brigham Young, was most likely from the elite families, the Network, but the history books try to show him of humble origins. I show some evidence for this below.

My own hypothesis about the true origin of the church is based on stories I learned growing up in the church. If someone else has already proposed the same, I have not yet found it. In a nutshell, a popular preacher of the early nineteenth century, Sidney Rigdon, decided to use a charismatic youth, Joseph Smith, to sell his new version of Christianity. He wanted to tie the Middle East version as found in the Bible with a new version from the new world in a new book, the Book of Mormon.

But Sidney knew he needed a handsome face for the organization, a public relations representative, someone young and charismatic to attract the people. He also needed a good origination story, the first vision and the translation of the Book of Mormon. The official story says that Joseph met Sidney Rigdon later on and converted him to the new movement. There’s evidence, however, that Sidney Rigdon was already acquainted with young Joseph Smith, see picture and link above.

Sidney was probably not the only other person aware of the plan. There were other characters involved, including Joseph Smith’s family and their friends. Sidney remained an influential figure in the Mormon organization and assumed he would take control after Joseph’s death (or retirement). This is exactly what happened. When Joseph died, Sidney Rigdon appealed to the church to make him their leader, but Brigham Young took control of the church instead and led the people to desert of Utah.

Brigham Young came on board the Mormon train and immediately became a central figure, eventually becoming the conductor. This fact alone is not suspicious. Any person with the necessary charisma and motive could have joined and become a central figure. But this is the MO of the network, or any group that wants to infiltrate another group. If they see an organization they can use, they’ll have some of their people join it and give them the necessary resources to become leaders, namely time and money. With more money and time, charismatic infiltrators can easily gain control. Most people have jobs and families consuming a majority of their time. Infiltrators will have all the time in the world and more resources than their competition.

So how to prove that Brigham Young came from the Network? The biggest clue is that he’d have the necessary connections, since the Network is composed of the elite families who only intermarry each other. The following source shows Brigham Young’s famous relatives.

https://famouskin.com/family-tree.php?name=49422+brigham+young

For a more modern example, one of the Mormon Prophets, Ezra Taft Benson, is a directly related to the wealthy and influential Taft family, who are most likely a part of the Network. Many famous people in influential positions were members of this family or related to them. In addition, Ezra Benson married into wealth. His wife was the daughter of a famous jeweler who spent time as the court jeweler to the Czar of Russia. Ezra was also the former Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America. People in these positions only perform actions beneficial to the Network. He spent a lot of his time in the church, pushing fear propaganda about communism.

To be a member of the Mormon church in good standing, members must donate 10% of their earnings. This is tithing. If people want to go to the highest heaven and become gods, not only must they be baptized as a member of the Mormon church, they must also pay a full tithe. How does the church justify the idea that entering heaven costs money? All members are told, “it is a test of faith”. For example, if a family won’t have enough money for rent, food, and tithing, they should still pay their tithing and believe that the Lord would bless them with what they need.

The early church leadership devised a method to give the members additional motivation to pay their tithing, in addition to the direct commandment. They connected tithing to exaltation, not only for the living members but also for the members ancestors! They do this through temples.

1. For resurrection in an exalted state (exaltation) members must obtain their own secret ceremonies, stolen from the Masons, which are performed only in the temples. Not only must members get their own ceremonies, they need to continually perform the same temple ceremonies for their ancestors.
2. And to go to the temple, the member must be a full tithe payer.

Whenever possible, the Network prefers that people give them money willingly rather than using force. They have 2 reasons for this. It’s easier and it takes blame away from them. But this Network of influential families is not so much interested in money as most people believe. Since they can create whatever money they need through the banking system, they don’t need money. But the key is that they want our money! That’s a significant source of our power.

Sometimes the Network doesn’t like history’s influence on public opinion or they prefer people believed another version of events. With their vast resources and tactics, they can hide evidence from the lower classes, forge artifacts or artwork, and reinterpret difficult-to-hide evidence. They don’t need to worry about true eye witness accounts. Their authority figures can easily discredit this kind of evidence or just exclude it from official records. They can always create their own eye witness accounts. If they already control the situation, they can simply provide a credible cover story for their activity. Uncovering such things is often impossible or very time consuming. Fortunately, simple logic is available to all and can help reveal deceit. We may not discover truth, but at least we can conclude a treasure is buried!

There are many people investigating old architecture and noticing absurdities in the official narratives, implying a fabricated history or coverup of some sort. Architectural historical evidences are the most difficult historical evidences to conceal, so they are often intentionally demolished or “accidentally” destroyed by fire, an excuse credible enough for most people to believe. Some are wondering if already existing buildings were just repurposed, the official histories created to hide a civilization reset or conquered people. Many people think Mormon Temples fit this category, but I could not find much evidence for such.

An interesting example to consider, however, are the insane asylums supposedly built in the late 19th century. This video from Jon Levi discusses several insane asylums. People like him scrutinize the official narratives and ask questions the establishment historians ignore. The Territorial Insane Asylum in Provo Utah is an excellent example. Being born in Provo (not the insane asylum), I felt compelled to investigate the subject.

Most people who see the above picture, if not told, would never guess its official purpose was to treat and house the insane. But most people who read the history in Wikipedia would accept the story without question. Only a few people doubt official narratives. Many researchers outside the mainstream think structures like this already existed and their story is a complete fabrication with the purpose of hiding a former culture. Search the internet for “Mudflood” or “Tartaria” for more information about this (example). As a brief summary, architectural and artistic evidence suggests the existence of ancient civilizations missing from mainstream timelines. The abundance of evidence invalidates what the public education system teaches, i.e., the standard evolution of human civilization — cave man to the present. Unfortunately, those topics are far beyond the scope of this article.

After first learning about the asylum in Provo and its possible pre-existence, the implications fascinated me. It felt like learning about a treasure buried somewhere on my property. In my search for physical evidence, I found several references to the Provo asylum in Utah newspapers from the time period, see PHOTO2 at left. When the asylum was completed, the Salt Lake Democrat Thursday, July 16, 1885 edition, the Utah Territorial Governor Eli Houston Murray said, “We have an institution here equal to any in the states, and could even say to New York: Beat it if you can!”

In my newspaper search, I was unable to find any photographic evidence or drawings of its construction, which was strange. Neither did a search on the internet yield any construction images. When construction supposedly began on the asylum in 1881, source, Salt Lake City to the north had almost 21,000 residents and the population more than doubled 10 years later to over 44,000, so there was a lot of growth happening at that time. How did they acquire all of the building materials? After reading more about the subject, I believe that with enough money, this could have been done at the time. The joining of the first transcontinental railroad at Promontory Summit, 130 miles from Provo was completed over ten years earlier in January of 1870 with Brigham Young installing the last spike. According to official histories, there does seem to be sufficient railway development afterward to explain the necessary infrastructure for the building materials delivery. The historical record seems to be self-consistent on this aspect and gives plausible evidence of being true, but that is just an assumption and if it was a fabrication, the fabricators would have written it to be self consistent, so that’s not definitive proof of authenticity. For the time being, I will reject the already existing hypothesis, but the official story still seems totally absurd.

Across the Columbia River from my home, the homeless population in Portland Oregon has skyrocketed. Several homeless camps are even in my little town of Camas. This situation made me wonder about the insane asylums. How many of the homeless now are insane, feeble-minded, or would otherwise have qualified as such in territorial Utah? Back then the churches took care of homeless people, at least fed them. Now the government just gives them money. But when did the government ever build such elaborate and beautiful places to live for the homeless? Are historians saying the territories didn’t have insane homeless people? Granted, they probably had much less. But more logical (less absurd) explanations for the asylums must exist. If they actually housed insane people, maybe they were doing medical research on patients or were sexually abusing them, on people no one would believe if they told of their mistreatment. The popular idea of mistreatment is found in many books and sites, example, but could most of these stories have originated later, after the original uses of the buildings had passed? It’s feasible.

So what is the connection to the Mormon church? The history of the Territorial Insane Asylum shows how the Mormon church is just another organization, complicit in helping cover up the dealings of the Network. For example, the first superintendent of the asylum, Warren Newton Dusenberry was the founding principal of Brigham Young Academy in 1876, present day BYU. The Network is very interested in educating the public, so they would be especially interested in establishing the school for a large population who would end up never questioning their leaders or the government. In 1882, the asylum architect and Dusenberry visited asylums in other states. According to official history, the federal government was spending a lot of money to take care of the insane. Almost every state and territory was also building their own asylums for the insane¹. Here’s some details about 3 others near Utah.

1. Nevada
   • Prior to building their own insane asylum, Nevada patients were taken to California. In 1879, the state legislature appropriated $5000 for the property in Reno and $80,000 in 1881 for the first buildings. In July 1882 the original buildings were ready for occupancy, at 160 residents capacity.
2. Montana
   • In 1877 the Territory of Montana had 13 insane dependents when no provision existed, so they constructed a group of small buildings at Warm Springs. Over 1352 acres of land were used in their rehabilitation, consisting of manual labor and fresh air. The land, buildings, etc. , were valued at $ 533,000 and had accommodations for more than 1000 patients. The patients committed were indigent and non-indigent.
3. North Texas
   • On October 15, 1883 a contract for the erection of North Texas Lunatic Asylum, known as North Texas Hospital for the Insane since 1887, was awarded to John McDonald for $ 181,789. The building accommodated up to 400 patients and consisted of an administrative building and four wards each for male and female patients, kitchen, laundry and power plant.

The purposes of the asylums could also have been purely financially driven, excuses to inject money, people, and infrastructure into the West. The Network knew that many people would see the West as a land of freedom and possibility, and would want to establish themselves there. Rather than to let the expansion happen organically, the Network would want to control the expansion and put their own members in the most beneficial positions. The Network can create money whenever they want, read about how the financial system works, and in particular why their education system neglects teaching how money is created.

If we revisit Warren Newton Dusenberry, Wikipedia says that Dusenberry went on a mission to the Southern States in 1867 (vacation for a year?) and then was reassigned to help in the immigration office in Boston to help Mormon church members prepare to move west. Seems like a member of the Network assigned to moving people and preparing education systems. They wanted the Mormon church to grow and being more isolated would help that. Their beginnings in the East proved that they had problems living among other people. The Network wanted a strong Mormon church to produce zombie members. I used to be one of them, and it’s kind of not an insult! It’s just the reality of the situation. I’ve learned that we need to learn to accept our limitations. It’s okay to admit we’ve been bamboozled!

A complementary hypothesis originates from the buildings resemblance to a fine hotel or palace. Maybe the Network used these buildings as temporary residences and places to stay when they were traveling through the territory. If they were directing events, transactions, and taking care of other issues, they’d need places to stay, places more suited to their wealthy lifestyle. For more evidence, the interiors of these “asylums” should be more fitting to wealthy residents and visitors, rather than rooms for the insane. I could not find any old interior pictures of the Utah asylum, but the Asylum in Athens OH has a few, see this article and the ballroom of PHOTO3.

Consider their staff, see PHOTO4 taken from the same source. These are well dressed people and could easily be wealthy members and servants of the Network. They also have the perfect ruse. No one would want to visit this place or allowed to visit except for family members of the insane, and if the insane residents didn’t exist, then no one other than government officials would be visiting, and these would be people who knew what was happening, the real purpose of the place. Although this last hypothesis is plausible, it doesn’t really matter. The possibility is offered as an example of how the Network operates in plain site. All they need is a good cover story and since they would always want to own the presses (the mainstream media of the time), they can make up whatever story they want. Any journalists or investigators outside their system won’t have any outlet the people would believe. All they need is a good cover story, and why not use a story people would want to believe, to nurse the poor and insane back to health!

As a final consideration, the high quality of the construction coincide with its use intended for the upper classes for the time. The walls of the main building in Provo are built of sandstone and pressed brick. The basement is built of stone, 25 inches in thickness. Above the basement the brick walls are 17 inches thick. The main entrance to the building is entirely of stone and consisting of 27 steps (a number the Network loves to include). The building is four stories high with an attic, a center, and two other towers, and is thoroughly ventilated and heated with the plenum system, together with direct radiation. The building is floored with polished Georgia pine.

Sources

1) THE INSTITUTIONAL CARE OF THE INSANE IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA
BY HENRY M. HURD , WILLIAM F. DREWRY, RICHARD DEWEY, CHARLES W. PILGRIM , G. ALDER BLUMER AND T. J. W. BURGESS
EDITED BY HENRY M. HURD, M.D., LL.D.
VOLUME III
THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS
BALTIMORE , MD. 1916

^{As a side note, many people spent a lot of time to write this huge record of asylums. Although they could have taken the information from official sources, they could have spent the same amount of time making it up.}

Are Mormon leaders lying or just fools? Of course, there’s no way for us to tell, but IMHO the church leadership from the lower levels are true believers. From my experience, lower level leaders like Bishops and Stake Presidents are usually wealthier and are taught that they’re wealthy because of their righteousness, which coincidentally gives them extra motivation to repay the Lord by working harder for his church. Not only does this belief motivate wealthier members, the poorer members are constantly reminded that if they are righteous, they can become wealthier too. God or the Lord put wealthier people in authority and gave them money and resources so they could more easily help build the kingdom of God on the Earth, AKA, the Mormon Church.

Mormons are taught to have complete faith in their leaders. This is one of the paramount beliefs and it follows logically from their other core belief. Their God would never allow his people to be led astray (unless they’re wicked), so he would not allow the leaders of his church to do so.

This is a powerful mind control technique. Whenever any members disagree with the leadership or when the teachings of the church conflict with their own beliefs, their inner conscience tells them to trust their leaders instead of their own thoughts and internal logic. This happens all the time. Members sometimes ask their leaders to reevaluate issues. I noticed this happen recently during the covid19 scare, when church leaders went along with everything the government did, including accepting possible forced vaccinations. The idea of forced vaccinations goes against the core Mormon and Christian belief of freedom of choice. Many members made videos and wrote letters to their prophet, showing how vaccinations can cause damage in a segment of the population. These of course were ignored, much like the government ignores people without connections.

I have little direct experience with the higher levels of church leadership. When I was on my Mormon mission in the Virginia states, I interacted with the Mission President and his wife. They were super nice. Like most Mission Presidents, he was retired and wealthy. Mine in particular owned several apartment complexes and had his own business. The church provided them with a large house for mission business and he spent a majority of his time working with the young missionaries, traveling a lot and conducting many meetings. One meeting in particular, we had a higher level church leader speak to us, a man named Yoshihiko Kikuchi. Instead of feeling inspired by his talk, I remember him basically yelling at us for not working hard enough. I ended up feeling like we weren’t good enough and the Lord was displeased with our efforts. Granted, many of my fellow missionaries were wasting their time and not following the rules, but most of us were constantly working and trying our best. Not feeling good enough is just another mind control technique, to keep us from considering the absurdity of the big picture.

What’s the purpose of it all? If the Mormon church is built on lies, what do the controllers really want the organization to accomplish? Their official goal of helping people achieve exaltation is just a lie, a delicious worm on a hook. Do they simply want money? They’re getting a lot of money for sure, but like most organizations, they have other goals. To better understand the situation, think of the different purposes in terms of levels.

There are at least 2 purpose levels, and each level depends on the specific entities pulling the strings. The entities directly pulling the strings of human society are the higher level, the Network. These higher level controllers are like the banker of Monopoly, covertly taking money from the bank. They base their actions on their foundation or a lower level, the rules of the game and how they can cheat without getting caught. The lower level controllers are the Gods. In Gnosticism, these Gods are called the Archons, which is just the Greek word for rulers.

1. The Higher Level
   • The Network wants to maintain the status quo and strengthen their children’s position.
     • Just like every other group, they want to keep what they have. Their actions are different from the commoner only because they are in a different position and have many more options. If put in the same situation, most humans would act the same. To keep their wealth and position, the Network must maintain and improve the system they’ve worked so hard to build. This system is human society, the governments and institutions that people believe must be in place to maintain order. Public opinion keeps it in place, so they must maintain organizations which influence what the public believes, especially religions and education.
     • One of the best ways to keep people from achieving a better system is to take away their resources, most importantly their time! The Mormon church is the perfect example of this. Good Mormons spend the majority of their time working for the church, and they give a lot of their money to it! They have little time for anything else, and if they did, their other beliefs would prevent them from doing any real damage to the system. The Network likes to encourage the public to think the system is already serving them!
     • As a final note, the Network wants to reduce the probability of lower class members damaging their system. Many actions accomplish this: keep society in a constant state of stress, keep us busy, distracted, angry with each other, in debt, physically sick. They want us to have huge infrastructure systems to support to keep the tax burden high so we have to work more.
2. The Lower Level
   • The Gods or the Archons designed our life cycle, our instincts, our mental capacity, our environments and habitat. They are probably intelligent enough to know how creatures would act in our situation! They probably expected human society to function exactly as it does! Consider the beehive and how each bee is just following its programming. Who is getting all the honey?
     • They designed a life where we are constantly distracted and challenged. These Gods won’t let us have something worthwhile without a fight or for free. Nature is the perfect example. Even the mighty male lion has to constantly fight other male lions to maintain his pride!
     • They designed a system allowing the Network to exist and act exactly as they do. Although the Network acts to achieve its own goals, they are maximizing stress for the rest of humanity, exactly what the Archons want. Maybe this condition produces their honey.
     • Unless we put conscious effort into investigating our real situation and options, we’ll be swept away by the current of wherever the Archons put us, see my post about the Subconscious.